Law school / T14 + splitter matrix
Good GPA for Law School
Updated 15 May 2026
T14 law school median GPAs cluster between 3.86 and 3.94 per ABA 509 disclosures. LSAT typically carries more weight than GPA in admissions decisions, which creates the "splitter" dynamic: high LSAT compensates for moderate GPA, and vice versa. This page reproduces the T14 median table from ABA data and provides a splitter matrix for self-assessment.
T14 median GPAs from ABA 509
The American Bar Association requires every ABA-accredited law school to publish annual disclosures of admissions statistics under the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar's Required Disclosures (509 Reports). Median GPA and median LSAT for the entering class are published each year. The table below reports recent T14 figures:
| Law school | Median GPA | Median LSAT |
|---|---|---|
| Yale Law School | 3.94 | 175 |
| Stanford Law School | 3.93 | 174 |
| Harvard Law School | 3.93 | 174 |
| University of Chicago | 3.91 | 173 |
| Columbia Law School | 3.87 | 173 |
| NYU School of Law | 3.88 | 172 |
| University of Pennsylvania (Carey) | 3.91 | 172 |
| University of Virginia | 3.93 | 171 |
| University of Michigan | 3.86 | 171 |
| Duke University School of Law | 3.86 | 171 |
| Northwestern (Pritzker) | 3.93 | 172 |
| UC Berkeley (Boalt Hall) | 3.87 | 171 |
| Cornell Law School | 3.88 | 172 |
| Georgetown University Law Center | 3.86 | 171 |
Medians vary year over year. Verify the current cycle's 509 disclosure directly at the linked ABA portal. T14 here follows the conventional US News ranking convention; the exact T14 composition has shifted modestly over time.
Why LSAT outweighs GPA
Aggregated admissions outcomes data and LSAC research suggest the LSAT carries roughly 60-70% of the admissions weight at ABA-accredited schools, with GPA carrying roughly 25-30% and soft factors (essays, recommendations, work experience, diversity) accounting for the remainder. The published US News ranking methodology also gives LSAT 50% greater weight than UGPA in the schools-quality component, reinforcing the institutional pressure to prioritise LSAT in admissions.
The reason for LSAT dominance is that the LSAT is a standardised measure across all applicants while undergraduate GPA reflects different institutions, majors, grading practices, and grade-inflation rates. A 3.7 from MIT in chemistry signals very differently from a 3.7 from a non-selective school in education, but both report as "3.7" on the application. LSAT removes this variance: a 170 means the same thing regardless of the applicant's undergraduate institution.
The splitter matrix
Because LSAT and GPA are weighted differently and because admissions models allow trade-off between the two, applicants whose LSAT and GPA are mismatched ("splitters") can be admitted to schools where one number alone would not qualify them. The standard splitter has a high LSAT and a moderate GPA; the reverse splitter has a high GPA and a moderate LSAT. The matrix below summarises typical outcomes:
| GPA | LSAT 180 | LSAT 175 | LSAT 170 | LSAT 165 | LSAT 160 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.90+ | Auto-admit | Auto-admit at most | Competitive T14 | T20-T30 | T50 |
| 3.80-3.89 | Auto-admit T14 | Competitive T14 | Lower T14 | T20-T30 | T50 |
| 3.70-3.79 | Competitive T14 | Lower T14 | T15-T30 | T30-T50 | T75 |
| 3.60-3.69 | Lower T14 splitter | T20-T30 splitter | T30-T50 | T50-T75 | T100 |
| 3.50-3.59 | Splitter to T14 | Splitter to T20 | T30-T50 | T75 | T100 |
| 3.40-3.49 | Reverse splitter pool | T30-T50 stretch | T50-T75 | T100 | T100-T150 |
| 3.20-3.39 | Splitter pool | T50 stretch | T75-T100 | T100-T150 | T150+ |
| 3.00-3.19 | Reverse splitter pool | T75-T100 stretch | T100-T150 | T150+ | T150+ |
Indicative competitive range, not admission guarantee. Soft factors (essays, work experience, diversity, application timing) shift outcomes around the matrix. Yield-protection by individual schools can also affect where a splitter lands.
The LSAC GPA recalculation
LSAC recomputes undergraduate GPA on its own 4.0 scale and applies the LSAC-computed value to admissions, not the transcript value. The recalculation has several important properties. First, LSAC includes all undergraduate coursework attempted, even courses retaken or replaced under undergraduate institution policy. A student whose home institution removed certain old grades from the GPA computation under academic renewal will see those grades back in the LSAC computation.
Second, LSAC uses a uniform conversion table for non-standard grading systems (plus-minus, percentage-based, narrative evaluations). The resulting LSAC GPA can be materially different from the transcript GPA in either direction. Third, LSAC counts repeated courses additively rather than as substitutions, so a student who retook a course and received a higher grade has both attempts in the LSAC GPA.
The practical implication: always assess law school competitiveness based on the LSAC GPA, not the transcript GPA. Calculate the LSAC GPA before applying, either through the LSAC service directly or by using LSAC's published recalculation rules. The LSAC GPA is what shows up in admissions decisions and in ABA 509 statistics.
Strategic implications by GPA range
3.85+ LSAC GPA: Most law schools are accessible with a 170+ LSAT. The strategic question shifts to which T14 or T20 school to target based on geography, post-graduation career goals, and merit-aid offers.
3.6-3.85 LSAC GPA: Competitive with a 175+ LSAT (splitter strategy) for some T14; competitive with a 170+ LSAT for T20-T30. The reverse-splitter case (3.85 GPA with a 165 LSAT) is more difficult than the standard-splitter case because the LSAT compensating effect goes both directions but the LSAT compensates more strongly for low GPA than the GPA compensates for low LSAT.
3.3-3.6 LSAC GPA: Splitter strategy required for T20+ admission. A 175-180 LSAT pulls the application into the splitter pool. Without a top LSAT, the realistic target range is T50-T100.
Below 3.3 LSAC GPA: Significant splitter strategy required. Above-90th-percentile LSAT (170+) needed for any T50 chance. Without a strong LSAT, ABA-accredited admission may require less-selective schools or alternative paths (paralegal experience, additional advanced degrees, work-experience-based applications to part-time programmes).
Educational reference. Not legal or admissions advice. Verify current ABA 509 disclosures and LSAC rules directly.